Thank you for this summary. Can you explain (or hypothesize) why the mRNA vaccine would cause cardiac cell damage (or elevated troponin levels) in some children but not others? Indeed, 295 of the 300 children didn't have elevated levels. But why were those 5 children so unlucky?
Please know that I'm not in any way trying to minimize a rate of 5 out of of 300 children--it's an insane risk to take for no apparent benefit, in my opinion--but it's something I've been curious about regarding vaccine injuries generally.
Thanks for these links. They certainly demonstrate the mechanisms by which the mRNA shots damage the heart. But why doesn't this happen across the board? Is it that the spike protein doesn't typically reach the heart, but when it does, it causes problems?
Thank you for this summary. Can you explain (or hypothesize) why the mRNA vaccine would cause cardiac cell damage (or elevated troponin levels) in some children but not others? Indeed, 295 of the 300 children didn't have elevated levels. But why were those 5 children so unlucky?
Please know that I'm not in any way trying to minimize a rate of 5 out of of 300 children--it's an insane risk to take for no apparent benefit, in my opinion--but it's something I've been curious about regarding vaccine injuries generally.
I'd be grateful for any insight you have.
We know: LNP is inflammatory https://t.co/yNPD2oJrML https://t.co/EQ6goQS81W S1spike is attacking endothelium and heart cells https://t.co/KAiwSlktR7 https://t.co/Wk71jvTMxB Everyone's risk is increased post admin: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712 it's corelated https://t.co/EDpoz2aBmY
Thanks for these links. They certainly demonstrate the mechanisms by which the mRNA shots damage the heart. But why doesn't this happen across the board? Is it that the spike protein doesn't typically reach the heart, but when it does, it causes problems?
It is not only Spike protein, it is Lipid nanoparticle also working in tandem (for LNP it is well established and in SEC filings Moderna admitted -first two links, it is inflammatory, and other mechanisms currently unknown) bioavailability studies clearly show that content of the shot definitely does not stay in the shoulder muscle! Two sources : https://www.docdroid.net/xq0Z8B0/pfizer-report-japanese-government-pdf and https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M4_4223_185350.pdf
Here is my response:
https://sanjayverma-66740.medium.com/it-doesnt-matter-what-i-believe-it-only-matters-what-i-can-prove-87130a10e39e
One of the reasons they wanted almost everyone to get it is so that can use that '`no control" arm trick.
If the control arm was so important to them, why did pfizer also inject the control arm whilst its "study" was still progress?
Do we have control arms for everything else? Do we need control arms to know any causation?
Where was their control arm for their "safe and effectiveness" lie?
It is just trick that their pushers and supporters will parrot.
"At this point there is no health agency in the world that does not causally link the messenger RNA COVID vaccine with myocarditis..."
Are you sure? Have you seen the mandate from the Australian state govts that the HCWs must get a third dose, or else? I am 100% sure re NSW Australia.
They STILL push people to get more!
The recent weekly data from NSW showing that ALL the dead had 2 doses, or more. One sentence says "xx% *only" had 3 doses....
Compare this with "Covid caused" myo-pericarditis (none fyi) check figure2 https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2219/htm